Week 10 Phenomenology
“Meaning. Identity, Embodiment,” by Amelia jones is the
exploration of the issue of identity in relation to art. The example used in this is the painting,
“The origin of the World,” by Gustave Courbet.
In the essay Jones argues clearly in the essay her viewpoint on issues
of gender and sexuality. Jones expresses
strong enmity toward the interpretations of Courbet’s painting. Through this essay we can see that Jones
believes that we can make a better sense of the painting or artwork through the
creator. In the essay Jones says, “It is
not enough, to understand the social and cultural effects of visual imagery
purely in terms of disembodied structure of the “gaze.”” To me this meant that even though there is a
that level of interpretation missing from a piece despite giving information
based on what we see. Which is
interesting because in our discussion of the oppositional gaze and visual
pleasure, there is the argument of sexualization in a work of art. The visual pleasure is more about film, but I
believe that according to Jones’ argument on issues of gender sexuality, this
is relevant. When I think about this
article in comparison to, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” the focus
from Laura Mulvey was in the representation of women in cinema. Arguing about power between men and women and
even in Jones’s essay there is this argument again on power. The oppositional gaze article by Bell hooks
however was the discussion on racial power within the gaze upon specifically
black women as a focus in the article. My
point is that I think that the argument of power can be made in almost any
relation toward the discussion of art and the creator.
To understand what phenomenology, it is the theory or thought
that elaborates information within the cultural and physical experiences viewed
within art. Another way that I interpreted
this was that phenomenology is the study of an individual’s lived experience of
the world. I think that this essay is
touching on the aspects I briefly stated earlier in the gaze or view we as
individuals have. The art we view is how
we determine it in an individual level, and I think that is what this essay
really is about. That there are and will
always be a level of art that is not viewed as art to others. Then there is art that’s challenged within
society. This is a stretch as an
argument, but I think comic book covers is an example in this relation. I chose to use the comic book cover done by
Mirka Andolfo for the comic book Unnatural published by Image comics. Now, I understand that this cover can be determined
as sexual, or even provocative. Based
on this essay I wanted to challenge the idea using something modern. This comic is popular, and is also considered
art. So, to what degree is something not? To what degree is something considered
specifically sexual? I am curious though;
do you think this is considered art? Why?
Why not?
https://imagecomics.com/comics/releases/unnatural-1
https://lms.hypothes.is/lti_launches

Comments
Post a Comment